Skip to main content

NETWORKS

Who does business with whom

10 datasets, none of which any agency publishes. Every row on every one of them names two parties and the evidence that ties them — a servicer and its client, an issuer and the buyer that took its servicing, a builder and the lender it owns. Each is assembled, derived or curated here; each card says which, and what stands behind the rows.

These surfaces reach the rest of the product rather than sitting on their own: a company with rows in any of them carries a Networks tab on its company page, and the state hubs name every one of them — with a tab where the source has an honest geographic grain, and with the reason where it does not.

CURATED, EVIDENCE-TIERED

Who subservices for whom, and how those relationships have moved.

EVERY ROW · a servicer and the company whose loans it actually services

  • Look up who subservices a named lender's book, and who that lender subservices for
  • Read each relationship's evidence tier, source document and last-checked date
  • See relationships we hold but do not claim — the research queue is shown, not hidden
Assembled from cited public evidence — servicer portals, credit-union disclosures, press releases — with a 1-6 evidence tier and a source link on every row. No agency publishes this file.
DERIVED FROM DISCLOSURE

Rank every servicing operator on cohort-adjusted, interval-bounded performance ratios against the whole Ginnie population.

EVERY ROW · a subservicer and the cohort-adjusted performance of the book it services

  • Stack rank subservicers by cohort-adjusted roll rates and IOPP
  • Isolate subservicer execution from originator credit quality
  • Watch performance drift quarter over quarter
Derived from Ginnie Mae pool-level loan state history and issuance data, mapped through the subservicing client map to aggregate performance at the operator level.
DERIVED FROM DISCLOSURE

Who issues, who immediately owns the servicing — Ginnie PIIT flows, dollars and dateable transfer events.

EVERY ROW · the issuer that created a pool and the buyer that owned its servicing on day one

  • See which issuers sell servicing at issuance, to whom, and in what dollars
  • Read a single issuer's counterparties, month by month, with dateable transfer events
  • Separate genuine co-issue flow from ordinary bulk transfers after the fact
Derived from Ginnie Mae's PIIT / new-issuance transfer disclosure (nimonSFS record 03). The disclosure records the transfer; it does not publish the map, the dollars or the counterparty ranking.
DERIVED FROM DISCLOSURE

Who is acquiring and who is shedding mortgage servicing — the Ginnie transfer graph, its volume over time and a velocity ranking.

EVERY ROW · the issuer shedding servicing and the issuer acquiring it

  • Rank issuers by net servicing acquired or shed, and by portfolio turnover velocity
  • Follow the named counterparty graph — who buys from whom, repeatedly
  • Watch transfer count and UPB move month over month against the same book
The time-derivative of the co-issue map, computed over Ginnie's servicing-transfer and new-issuance-transfer disclosures. Every edge names both parties and resolves them to the company spine where a verified link exists.
PUBLIC FILINGS, ASSEMBLED

Which mortgage CUSOs serve which credit unions — the shared-infrastructure map of the credit-union channel, from the NCUA CUSO Registry.

EVERY ROW · a credit union service organization and the credit unions it serves

  • Find which mortgage CUSOs a credit union shares infrastructure with
  • Rank CUSOs by the number of distinct credit unions associated with them
  • Read the mortgage service taxonomy each CUSO actually registers under
Assembled from the NCUA CUSO Registry, which publishes registrations one at a time and never as a mortgage network. Credit unions are resolved to charter numbers; the CUSO itself is spine-matched only when it files HMDA in its own name.
CURATED, EVIDENCE-TIERED

Which homebuilders and brokerages own or joint-venture the mortgage, title and insurance businesses on their own transactions.

EVERY ROW · a homebuilder or brokerage and the lender, title or insurance business it owns

  • See which builders and brokerages originate on their own transactions, and through what structure
  • Read the SEC filing behind each affiliation, with an evidence tier per row
  • Follow structure changes over time — a JV bought out, a captive wound down
Curated from SEC filings for public homebuilders and brokerages, with the structure (wholly owned, joint venture, marketing agreement) and an evidence tier on every relationship. RESPA-affiliated business is disclosed at closing, never published as a map.
CURATED, EVIDENCE-TIERED

Which state Housing Finance Agency runs its own Ginnie servicing, which outsources, and — where the evidence names one — to whom.

EVERY ROW · a state housing finance agency and the master servicer it hands its book to

  • See which state HFAs issue Ginnie securities themselves and which outsource
  • Read the named master servicer where the evidence supports one
  • Compare programme mix, servicing model and book size across all 50 states
Curated agency by agency from HFA publications and programme documents, with a source link, an evidence tier and a last-checked date per row, and joined to the Ginnie issuer book where the agency issues in its own name.

Complaints-Rate Stack

🔒 SOLOON THE ANALYTICS DESK
DERIVED FROM DISCLOSURE

Complaints per serviced loan by servicer, ranked at both ends over the Ginnie book, with the stated denominator on every row.

EVERY ROW · a servicer and the complaint rate of the book it services

  • Rank servicers at both ends by CFPB servicing complaints per serviced loan
  • Read the denominator on every row — the Ginnie serviced book it is divided by
  • See what the raw complaint count hides: volume is not a quality signal
A ratio no agency publishes: the CFPB complaint database over the Ginnie Mae serviced-loan book, joined on the company spine. Servicers under the minimum book size are excluded rather than ranked on noise.

Agency-MBS Demand Map

🔒 SOLOON THE AGENCY DESK
DERIVED FROM DISCLOSURE

Which registered funds hold whose Ginnie collateral — per issuer, who holds your paper; per fund, what it holds, in dollars and positions.

EVERY ROW · a registered fund and the Ginnie issuer whose collateral it holds

  • See who holds a given issuer's paper, in dollars and positions
  • Read a fund back to the agency collateral it actually holds
  • Watch demand concentration move quarter over quarter
Derived by joining SEC Form N-PORT fund holdings to the Ginnie pool factor file on CUSIP. Both files are public; neither says who holds whose paper.

Non-QM Deal Calendar

🔒 SOLOON THE MARKET DESK
PUBLIC FILINGS, ASSEMBLED

The private-label non-QM securitization calendar — deals, their sponsors, and the due-diligence firms that reviewed them.

EVERY ROW · a securitization sponsor and the due-diligence firm that reviewed its tape

  • Track the private-label non-QM calendar deal by deal, with its shelf and sponsor
  • See which third-party review firms sign off for which aggregators
  • Read the loan-tape gap plainly: 144A deals publish no asset-level file
Assembled from SEC Form ABS-15G, the only registered disclosure the 144A non-QM market leaves behind. Deals, shelves, depositors and TPR firms are joined into one calendar that no filing contains.

WHAT PROPRIETARY MEANS HERE · Not that the inputs are secret. Every one of these is built from public filings, disclosures and publications — the work is the assembly, the derivation and the curation, and the claim each row makes is only as strong as the evidence recorded beside it. Where a relationship is held but not claimed, the surface shows it as a research row rather than dropping it. See data attribution for each underlying source’s licence and publisher link.

Networks — the counterparty maps nobody publishes | MortRadar